Independent Assurance Report to Cairn Energy PLC
Cairn Energy PLC ("Cairn Energy") appointed ERM to provide independent assurance on selected information presented in its online 2009 Corporate Responsibility Report ("the CR Report").
Our brief
We were asked to provide independent assurance on the following subject matters:
- Selected Corporate Responsibility ("CR") KPIs:
- Staff, contractor and third party fatalities (number of);
- Lost time injury frequency rate (number of lost time incidents per 1,000,000 hours worked);
- Total energy consumption (GJ);
- Water consumption (m3);
- Number and volume of oil spills to the environment (number and volume);
- Amount of oil discharged in water (tonnes per million tonnes of hydrocarbon);
- Social investment expenditure (Total expenditure in GBP);
- Total direct greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes of CO2 equivalent, and tonnes of CO2 equivalent per million tones of hydrocarbon); and
- NOx emissions (tonnes).
- Cairn Energy's CR Report's status of compliance against the GRI G3 Guidelines to level C+.
Our approach
Standards and criteria used
We delivered our work in accordance with ERM's assurance methodology which is based on the following international assurance and audit standards: ISAE 3000, ISO14064:3, and ISO 19011.
We planned and performed our work to obtain all the information and explanations that we believe were necessary to provide a basis for our assurance conclusions as to whether the reported information and data set out in the 'Our Brief' was appropriately reported.
We used Cairn's own definition of the selected CR KPIs as assessment criteria when undertaking our data systems review work. These are presented in more detail in the CR Report. Similarly, we used the GRI C level requirements as our criteria for the above subject matter B.
If we had been asked to conclude on whether the selected disclosures are materially accurate, we would have needed to conduct more work at corporate and site levels and to gather further evidence to support our assurance opinion.
The reliability of the reported information and data is subject to inherent uncertainties, given the available methods for determining, calculating or estimating the underlying information. It is important to understand our assurance conclusions in this context.
Our work
A multi-disciplinary team of corporate responsibility and assurance specialists performed work at Corporate level as well as at selected assets, and relied on the assurance work done by ERM India for Cairn India Limited on its 2009 IFC Annual Monitoring report in relation to the above subject matters. Our assurance activities included:
- Face-to-face interviews at Corporate level to understand the processes in place for reporting CR data and the underlying data management system. These were followed-up with a review of relevant documentation;
- Face-to-face interviews with country-level CR managers for key areas of operation (India, Bangladesh, Greenland, Tunisia, Albania) to test CR data reporting and application of GRI requirements;
- Reviewing and testing of selected evidence for the selected assurance subject matters e.g. design of CR report in accordance to GRI requirements, and data measurement, collection and reporting processes;
- Reviewing and relying upon the outcome of the report assurance work undertaken at Cairn India Limited by ERM India (e.g. assessment at two operational sites as well as Head Office reviews and interviews);
- Reporting our assurance findings to management as they arose to provide them with the opportunity to correct them prior to finalisation of our work; and
- Review of the presentation of information relevant to the scope of our work in the CR Report to ensure consistency with our findings.
Respective responsibilities and ERM's independence
Cairn is responsible for preparing the CR Report and for the information in it. ERM's responsibility is to express our assurance conclusions on the agreed brief.
During 2009, ERM has worked with Cairn on other consulting engagements. ERM operates strict conflict checks and we have confirmed our independence to Cairn for delivering our assurance.
Our assurance conclusions
Based on our work undertaken as described above, we conclude that in all material respects:
- Selected Corporate Responsibility ("CR") KPIs:
- The KPIs a) to g) as presented above are appropriately reported within the CR Report; and
- With regards to the KPIs h) Total direct greenhouse gas emissions and i) NOx emissions, Cairn Energy is currently using air emission factors from the Methods for estimating atmospheric emissions from E&P operations (OGP) dating from 1994 rather than more recent ones i.e. 2009. We have found that the reported data for these two KPIs within the CR Report is appropriately reported in accordance to Cairn's methodology and the use of such 1994 greenhouse gas emission factors. However this is not considered best practice. If Cairn Energy was using 2009 emission factors, it is expected that the reported total direct greenhouse emissions data for 2009 and previous years would materially increase. Please refer to Cairn Energy's following disclosures for further details including its commitment to using 2009 emission factors going forward for calculating GHG emissions and for updating its public reporting accordingly: About this report, Air emissions and Environment data.
- Cairn Energy's CR Report's status of compliance against the GRI G3 Guidelines to level C+
- Cairn Energy's CR Report status of compliance against the GRI G3 Guidelines level C+ requirements is appropriately reported as presented in the following section of the CR Report: GRI index.
The following logo
has been associated within the CR Report with the selected disclosures which have been provided assurance on.
Our key recommendations
Based on our work set out above, and without affecting our conclusions, here are our key recommendations for improvement.
- We welcome Cairn Energy's adoption of more recent emission factors i.e. The Compendium of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimation Methodologies for the Oil and Gas Industry (API, 2009). We recommend that Cairn Energy update its emissions factors for all emissions to air KPIs, update its data collection and reporting process with up to date emission factors as soon as feasible, ensure its adoption across the organisation, and update accordingly as soon as feasible its publicly reported performance for greenhouse gas emissions, NOx and other emissions to air.
- ERM encourages Cairn Energy to consider pursuing GRI-G3 level B+ within the next two years.

Environmental Resources Management Limited (ERM)
Edinburgh, UK, 16 April 2010
ERM is an independent global provider of environmental, social and corporate responsibility consulting and assurance services. Over the past 4 years we have worked with over half of the world's 500 largest companies, in addition to numerous governments, international organisations and NGOs.
Our assurance statement provides no assurance on the maintenance and integrity of the website, including controls used to achieve this, and in particular whether any changes may have occurred to the information since it was first published. These matters are the responsibility of Cairn Energy but no control procedures can provide absolute assurance in this area.